In this category there were the Swahili women groups and societies who turned ‘’lelemama’’ songs into songs of protests and revolution. Famous among them was Bibi Titi Mohamed (1926 – 2007), Hawa Bint Maftah, Tatu Bint Mzee of Dar es Salaam, Shariffa Bint Mzee of Lindi, Halima Selengia of Moshi, Dharura Bint Abdulrahman of Tabora, Mwanamwema bint Sultan of Tanga and many others pushing their struggle against colonialism through Muslim women societies and ‘’taarab’’ groups like ‘’Bomba Kusema,’’ ‘’Egyptian,’’ ‘’Al Watan,’’ ‘’Saniyyat Hubb,’’ ‘’Arab Congo’’ etc. etc. But the bed rock of the struggle was the Muslim clergy, the sheikhs like Sheikh Mohamed Ramia of Bagamoyo, Sheikh Yusuf Badi of Lindi and Sheikh Rashid Sembe of Tanga and ‘’maalims’’ of ‘’madrasas’’ and the ‘’tariqas’’ with the ‘’murids’’ who provided membership and leadership to TANU branches all over Tanganyika. The leader of this movement was Sheikh Hassan bin Amir who was the Mufti of Tanganyika and Zanzibar. All these patriots mentioned above although in passing were heroes in their own particular ways. Unfortunately all of them are missing in Tanganyika’s political history.
One may ask, ‘’Where was the Church, what role did the Church and the Christian clergy play during the struggle?’’ This is the bone of contention in the history of the struggle for independence in Tanganyika. The official version has conveniently omitted the decisive role of Muslims and Islam as an ideology of colonial resistance against foreign domination in Tanganyika. In Tanzania it is a taboo to associate the struggle for independence with Islam and Muslims. Is it because in Tanganyika the Church never played a significant role in the struggle for independence? It is also a fact that Christians assumed leadership positions in the independence government and are still monopolising those positions because of their superior education. Can this be the reason why Muslim contribution to independence struggle has over the years been down played? It is said those close to Nyerere urged him to write about the struggle for independence but he always refused. Oxford University Press who published many of his books even sent an emissary to him to discuss the subject but he turned them down. Could the fear of Muslims been the reason for his refusal?
The Fear of History and Heroes
Leaders in Africa seem to fear heroes other than themselves. If Bildad Kaggia had not written his autobiography ‘’Roots of Freedom’’ the history of Mau Mau in Kenya as a peasant movement against British colonialism would have many gaps. In absence of that work and many others by other patriots it would not have been possible to link the Kenyan struggle with the names of patriots like Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, Pio Gama Pinto, Makhan Singh and Dedan Kimathi.
Much as it is difficult to divorce the Kikuyu and Mau Mau from the struggle in Kenya so it is impossible to divorce the role of Muslims in spearheading the struggle against the British and in founding of TANU the party of independence. The Kikuyu bore the brunt of colonialism more than any other ethnic group in Kenya the way Muslims suffered more than any other group in colonial Tanganyika. In Kenya the British in their tactics of ‘’divide and rule’’ the focus was on ethnicity divide. The British appropriated Kikuyu land thus turning Kikuyus into squatters in their own land. As a result of this land grabbing policy of the British settler community the Kikuyu rose to the occasion and engaged the British through Mau Mau. In Tanganyika because of absence of tribalism the British fell back on religion to divide the people. Christians were elevated at the expense of Muslims. Christians through missionary schools and government grants were provided with schools to educate their children while Muslims were left to fend for themselves. Muslims suffered as colonised subjects singled out for discrimination by being denied education, curtailing any chances for self-advancement. The survival of Muslims as a people and Islam as a religion therefore lay in the total overthrow of the colonial state.
A nation which is formed from such a historical background of factions as in Tanganyika and Kenya of which those divisions were made by the colonising power with the sole purpose of creating rifts among the people is without any shade of doubt is going to create problems for any emerging African nation. First is the fact that during the struggle for independence there would be certain factions in the body politic whose support to the struggle would be lukewarm. There would also be factions who would prefer to sit on the fence as dependable mechanism to safeguard their privileges under colonial setting. This is because these factions feel colonialism is of benefit to them due to the privileges extended to them by the colonial government. But these positions are not tenable in a free country. In post colonial environment all factions including those who sat on the fence would wish to share power irrespective of their position to the struggle. These factions will no longer be satisfied with crumbs. They will demand the main course of the menu in capacity building and state formation. The direction of the country and indeed interpretation of peoples’ history will therefore depend on who takes the reins of power. If it is the comprador class which assume power after independence the country will find itself in a situation which faced and is facing many African countries today. The trend has been for that class in power to strive to find enemies among those who fought for freedom in order to justify and maintain their positions in society. The heroes who fought for independence are by stroke of a pen turned to enemies of the state.
Fallacies, Half Truths and Omissions
The political history of Tanzania is a victim of official history and witch hunting which followed immediately after independence. Official histories which are a norm in many authoritarian regimes choose and pick what it considers as appropriate to be included in the history of a nation. ’The ‘’truth’’ according to official histories usually goes contrary to facts. For many years people were made to believe that the urge for the people of Tanganyika to have a political party to fight for independence began with Julius Nyerere in 1954. This is a fallacy. The urge for the people of Tanganyika to organise themselves began in 1929 with the formation of the African Association (AA) in Dar es Salaam. The trend in Tanzania has been to down play the quarter century history of African Association and its leadership. The achievements of the African Association remained undocumented and very little were known about its leadership.
In 1986 after a silence of almost 25 years Ally Sykes (1926 – 2013) one of the 17 founder members of TANU in 1954 and a person who holds TANU card no. 2 and the person who issued card no. 1 to Nyerere the card which bears his signature gave an interview to a British journalist Paula Park. Park wrote a full page article on the Sykes’s family contribution to the political development of Tanganyika culminating into the founding of TANU in 1954. Shortly after, Park was paid a visit by immigration officials and quietly asked to leave the country. In 1988 an article was published in African Events (March/April) 1988 (pp 37- 41) in which Abdulwahid Sykes and other forgotten TANU pioneers received prominence. It is the norm that anything contrary to the official history is met with threats, hostility and at times sheer contempt.The author received sharp rebuke from Party historian, Dr. Mayanja Kiwanuka, a leading member of the panel which wrote Historia ya Chama Cha TANU 1954-1977, the official history of TANU and that particular issue was quietly removed from circulation. The article could not be allowed to be read because it contradicted the official TANU history.
In 1951 Abdulwahid and Ally Sykes, Mwapachu Dr Joseph Mutahangarwa, Chief Abdieli Shangali of Machame, Paramount Chief Thomas Marealle of Marangu, Chief Adam Sapi Mkwawa, Chief Harun Msabila Lugusha, Dr Mwanjisi, Abdulkarim Karimjee, Dr Vedas Kyaruzi, Juma Mwindadi, H.K. Viran, Stephen Mhando and Dossa Aziz.were requested by Ivor Bayldon, Brig. Scupham and V.M. Nazerali to support formation of a multiracial political party. A glaring omission from this list is the name of Julius Nyerere. Bayldon, Scuphum and Nazerali were members of the Legislative Council. African members of the Legislative Council who were enthusiastic about this new development of interracial alliance in politics were Chief Kidaha Makwaia and Yustino Mponda of Newala. Abdulwahid and the TAA inner circle refused to support this idea because TANU existed in their minds.
Abdulwahid Sykes had for many years been trying in vain to convince the powerful Chief David Kidaha Makwaia of Shinyanga to join TAA and be elected president and thereafter to form TANU. Chief Kidaha had made a mark in the politics of colonial Tanganyika in the Legislative Council. It was obvious to many that Chief Kidaha would lead the country as its first Prime Minister in free Tanganyika. Unfortunately to Chief Kidaha while he was seemingly ready to lead Africans of Tanganyika but he thought that leadership should come to him through a political process initiated by the British and not through the political movement by the TAA under the leadership of ‘’agitators’’ like Abdulwahid Sykes, Hamza Mwapachu and Sheikh Hassan bin Amir the members of TAA Political Subcommittee. Chief Kidaha politely declined the offer. In 1953 when Abdulwahid gave this offer to Nyerere he accepted, was elected TAA president in June 1953 and soon TANU was formed in July 1954. Despite of this Abdulwahid and Ally Sykes including their father Kleist Sykes and other patriots are not mentioned in the history of TANU.
It is not possible for any researcher to trace the origin of TANU outside the circle of the Sykes family. When Abdulwahid Sykes died in 1968 Brendon Grimshaw then Editor of Tanganyika Standard wrote an obituary in which he paid a glowing tribute to the Sykes family on its contribution to the political development of Tanganyika and without mincing words and without fear stated that ‘’much of the desire among Africans for a powerful political party in Tanzania came from the drive of the Sykes family.’’ Any attempt to rewrite TANU history by focusing on Nyerere and marginalising other patriots is bound to be met with many obstacles. Chief Kidaha and Abdulwahid Sykes are hardly mentioned in the history of TANU. Was Nyerere aware of what had transpired between Abdulwahid Sykes and Chief Kidaha before he appeared on the scene?
As fate would have it soon after independence Nyerere abolished chiefdoms and soon thereafter Chief Kidaha was arrested and ostracised to Tunduru a remote area in southern Tanganyika. Did Chief Kidaha get the time to reflect on his misjudgement decision to shun TAA and Abdulwahid’ offer? When he was released from detention Chief Kidaha immigrated to Kenya. Chief Kidaha’s history and contribution to political development in Tanganyika while serving as member of the Legislative Council in 1950s is not known to many students of Tanganyika’s history. It is a pity that Chief Kidaha never talked publicly about his political life and why he fell out with Nyerere. Chief Kidaha’s obituary had this to say about his stand in African politics of 1950s: ‘’Aware of the white man's ambitions for him, the canny chief avoided contact with "Young Turks" in the nationalist movements springing up at the time.’’
It is easy now to be able to understand the stand taken by Chief Kidaha at that time through publication of new information on decolonisation of Tanganyika. There is now new information that beginning 1950 the Special Branch embarked on a systematic campaign of surveillance on the TAA leadership and the names of Abdulwahid Sykes (who the reports contemptuously referred to as a Zulu), Steven Mhando and Hamza Mwapachu (who the government labelled as ‘’communists’’) and Mashado Plantan editor of Zuhra were high on Special Branch list. Chief Kidaha could not have been unaware of this because of his proximity to Governor Edward Twining and the colonial government. Historians in Tanzania have ignored Chief Kidaha Makwaia as they have ignored Abdulwahid Sykes. This is the reason why the genesis of mass mobilisation and the founding of TANU have skipped the two including others who were in the TAA Political Subcommittee and the focus has always been on Nyerere and Nyerere alone forgetting the fact that Nyerere came into lime light in 1953 when he defeated incumbent Abdulwahid Sykes for presidency of TAA. And again it is strange that when it is required to mention that Nyerere took leadership of TAA in 1953 the names of TAA leaders are as a rule not mentioned.
The Propagandists, the Singers and the Songs for Freedom
Radio broadcasting was introduced in Tanganyika in 1952. The colonial government set a up a radio station ‘’Sauti ya Dar es Salaam’’ which later came to be known as Tanganyika Broadcasting Corporation (TBC). The radio was mainly used by the colonial government for its own purpose of disseminating information that was relevant to its own administrative policies and propaganda. In between these tasks the government played music for entertainment of Africans and its colonial staff. This transformation introduced into the country a variety of music and artists from outside Tanganyika. The recording company His Masters Voice (HMV) which had Red Label for music from Europe introduced the Blue Label which was set aside for recording ‘’natives.’’ This encouraged local artists to compose and record their music which found their way to local air waves. Overtime African music gradually changed its tempo from love songs to songs of protests. These songs went hand in hand with the waves of agitating for freedom and the lyrics conveyed special message to the people. For obvious reasons these songs could not be recorded and therefore be played by the local radio station. But somehow a few of them found their way into the studios of record companies in Kenya and Johannesburg. Among the artists who sang for freedom and were able to record songs of protest were Frank Yosef Humplink (1927 – 2007) and Salum Abdallah.
The song ‘Yes No’ by Frank Humplink was the signature tune for TANU and was played before meetings to warm the stage before Sheikh Suleiman Takadir introduced Nyerere to address the people. The lyrics of the song ‘’Yes No’’ was perceived by the colonial administration in Tanganyika and Kenya as smacking of agitation against foreign domination and therefore inciting people to rebel. At that time Mau Mau was raging in Kenya, in Uganda Kabaka was in exile in Britain and there was war in Korea. In this kind of political climate the words in the song in which Frank Humplick mentioned China, Korea, Nyasaland and Communism the song it seems conveyed a special message to the oppressed. Overnight this song became a protest song for nationalists. The song became very popular and was sung by people everywhere. In no time Special Branch got wind of the message of the song and it did not seem to like the lyrics.
The colonial administration became worried with the song particularly the mention of communism, China and the reference to British colonies in East Africa which were anyway already in turmoil particularly the Mau Mau uprising in Kikuyu led by Dedan Kimathi not to mention the agitation by Hastings Banda in Nyasaland. The government banned the song and Frank Humplink was arrested. Special Branch was assigned to make sure that all copies of the song were destroyed. A house to house ‘’search and destroy’’ operation was conducted by the police and ‘’Sauti ya Dar es Salaam’’ stopped to play the song which for obvious reasons was very much in demand by listeners.
Frank Humplick received unexpected publicity and went down in history of Tanganyika to be the first artist whose work was banned by the government. Salum Abdallah’s song ‘’Kuku Mweusi Anapigana na Kuku Mweupe’’ with lyrics depicting the friction between races in colonial setting passed unnoticed and it enjoyed the air waves unmolested. Salum Abdallah after independence and before his death in 1965 was to compose songs praising Nyerere with messages of mobilising the people for nation building. Not a statue or a anything to remember this great band leader can be seen in his home town Morogoro where in 1947 he had set up his famous band – Cuban Marimba Chacha Band. But veterans of the struggle whenever they hear his music those tunes take them back through memory lane to the days of the struggle and to the early years of independence. There were also the propagandists who overtly and covertly spread the word both in print and in songs against the government like the Bantu group and its prominent members Athmani Issa who was the chairman and Hamisi Barika secretary, other prominent members were Rashid Sisso and Juma ‘’Mlevi,’’ Suleiman. Bantu group was the responsible for providing security to Nyerere. Among these patriots was Ramadhani Mashado Plantan the editor and proprietor of Zuhra the unofficial mouth piece of the TANU and Nyerere. Frank Humplink and Salum Abdallah unfortunately are not part of the history of the struggle of the people of Tanganyika against colonialism. Nothing exists in the National Museum about his their lives nor are the discs of the times in exhibition.
Conclusion
Where have
the heroes and heroines of the struggle for independence gone to? Is it that
Tanzania is an ungrateful nation and therefore hates its heroes?
This is now the bone of contention between Muslims and the government.
Muslims without mincing words are now pointing an accusing finger to the
Church particularly the Catholic Church which it is believed in
connivance with President Nyerere frustrated hopes and aspirations of Muslims
in free Tanganyika, a country they liberated from colonialism in 1961.[58] Muslims
are now organising nationwide mass rallies which openly and in live
broadcasts through Muslim radio stations denounce the church, criticise the
government and church agents within the ruling party CCM and the Parliament
for oppressing Muslims. Seemingly derogatory words like “pandikizi”
(singular) and “mapandikizi” (plural) meaning “turncoats;” or the new coined
word “Mfumo Kristo” roughly meaning “Christian dominance” are now part of the
Muslim and Swahili vocabulary. These analogies are used freely in the Muslim
media and among Muslims in every day conversation. But what usually thrills
Muslims and utterly significant showing that times have changed is when in
the rallies and in normal discussion Muslims refer to Nyerere hitherto known
respectfully as “Baba wa Taifa” as “Baba wa Kanisa,” meaning “Church Elder.” [59]
The move by
the Catholic Church to make Nyerere a saint has not helped matters. More so
it proves all the allegations levelled against him that he never was a
nationalist but a Catholic zealot. Respect and love which Muslims once
had for Nyerere has been completely wiped out. The new generation of Muslims
no longer believe in the official history of TANU and the propaganda that it
was Nyerere who single handed defeated the British. Muslims instead are in
their own ways honouring the forgotten heroes of independence movement and in
so doing invoking emotions particularly in the new generation to stand up
against oppression as their forefathers had done against foreign domination.
Muslim heroes of the Maji Maji War like Suleiman Mamba, Ali Songea Mbano,[60] and
Muslim nationalists like Abdulwahid and Ally Sykes, Dossa Aziz, Sheikh Hassan
bin Amir, Sheikh Suleiman Takadir, Sheikh Yusuf Badi, Bibi Titi Mohamed, Bibi
Tatu bint Mzee, Bilali Rehani Waikela,[61] Ali Migeyo and others are
now part of nationalist history which was suppressed for many years.[62] Muslims
are demanding the restoration of their history and honour as true liberators
of Tanganyika. This is unprecedented. One can only speculate and wonder where
this would lead to. Can we identify this phenomenon as corrective and
revision of history or is it a lesson of anarchy in recording history? [63]
|
|
|