A Short Introduction:
Reverend Christopher Mtikila
…one person who was been able to unite all Christians in their subtle
opposition to Mwinyi was the self proclaimed Reverend Christopher Mtikila, Head
of Full Salvation Church and Chairman of Democratic Party. [1] He has
openly declared his mission as that of defending Christianity against Islam.
Mtikila came to prominence in 1988 when he circulated a letter at the CCM
Kizota Conference in Dodoma in which he accused Mwinyi of propping up Islam at
the expense of Christianity Mtikila’s DP manifesto is to break the union
between Zanzibar and Tanganyika and to expel Arabs, Somalis and Indians from
the country. Conspicuously absent from his list of expulsion were Europeans. It
was not difficult to understand why. Mtikila was pro-Christian and therefore
could not be anti-European. In his many speeches Mtikila has shown outright
contempt to religious tolerance, the union and the ideals of multi-racial
society.
Mtikila’s followers went on rampage after a mass rally in which Mtikila
spoke beating up Indians and Arabs. Strange enough the state-radio provides air
time for Reverend Mtikila. At that time more than ten private newspapers under
Christian ownership were in circulation. The Christian monopoly in politics and
in the media contributed into fuelling religious tension because of its anti-
Muslim stand. The press picked on Muslims ministers scandalising them at will.
Muslims in the governments were accused by the press for all sorts of offences
from “praying in their offices” to "selling the country to rich Arab Sheikhs”
from the Middle East. Even the vocabulary had to change. People began to be
referred to by the colour of their skins. The press began to identify people as
“Arabs,” “Indians” and “indigenous Africans” reminiscent of colonial days; with
the exception that in colonial days Africans were then referred to as “natives.”
The Church should have risen to condemn Reverend Mtikila but it did not
do so instead Catholic Bishops of Tanzania through the Tanzania Episcopal
Conference (TEC) started to issue what came to be known as Pastoral Letters which were very critical of Mwinyi's rule
accusing his government of every ill in the country from incompetence to
corruption. [2]
The Pastoral Letters were echoed by the media and state-radio. The Pastoral
Letters were the last straw which broke the camel's back. It was now evident
that the Catholic Church was mixing politics with religion to the detriment of
the state, the aim which was to destabilise President Mwinyi and undermine his
confidence. Nyerere also joined in attacking Mwinyi accusing him of religious
bigotry. [3] When
Muslims were in control of politics they never allowed Nyerere to be humbled by
dissident Muslims. Sheikhs always rose up in unison to defend and protect the
political system from religious sentiments. Such patriotism was not forthcoming
from the Church.
…joining in this anti-Mwinyi anti Muslim campaign was the newly
established free press. In a daring and dramatic encroachment of the Church
into politics, the Tanzania Press Club hosted Reverend Christopher Mtikila,
secretary of Full Salvation Church. In that press luncheon of the Tanzania
Press Club Mtikila attacked Mwinyi's government as being corrupt echoing
Nyerere's speech of February that year. [4] Mtikila was not a new name in this anti-
Mwinyi campaign. In 1987 during the CCM-NEC conference in Dodoma he distributed
a document which among many allegations to Mwinyi he accused him of supporting
“Muslim fundamentalism” and slotting Muslims into important positions in his
government. Dar es Salaam University also hosted Mtikila and was allowed to
talk at the prestigious Nkrumah Hall, the centre of serious debate and lectures
by reputable personalities. Mtikila spit his venom by concluding his speech by
saying that “the Church must show the way.” [5]
[1] For more information see
MSAUD paper, “Vita vya Mchungaji Mtikila Dhidi ya Uislam,” 3 February, 1993.
Also Rev. C. Mtikila kwa Mwenyekiti Kamati ya Masuala ya Dini Nchini
FSC/ADM/370 27 April, 1989.
[2] Al-Markaz Sheikh Suleiman
Takadir, “Barua ya Kisiasa ya Maaskofu: Maaskofu Wana Nafasi Gani Katika
Serikali ya Nchi Hii.”
[3] Kiongozi, 1-15 January, 1994.
[4]Business Times, 22 June, 1990.
[5] In October,
1989 the Chairman of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) Colonel John
Garang visited Tanzania. Garang received
a very warm reception from the University Community which is predominant
Christian. The academic staff as well as students went out of their way to
poetry Garang as a “true son of Africa”, and a crusader against Muslim hegemony
in Sudan. And Garang cherished every moment of it. The ten percent Muslims at
the Dar Es Salaam University did not even dare pose a single question to Garang
much as it was evident that Garang was fighting an anti-Muslim war in the name
of war of liberation. It was not a wonder that Garang was receiving military
assistance and moral support from Christian controlled governments Tanzania
being one of them. Garang really felt at home.
Garang himself a Marxist Christian was speaking in a Marxist School and
among fellow Christians. Probably in response to this visit by Garang, the
government of Al Bashir sent its official delegation to try and explain to the
people of Tanzania its own point of view to the conflict. The Sudan government
delegation was coldly received at the University. Protocol was flouted
shamelessly. While Garang was accorded all the honours fit for a head of state,
the Vice Chancellor himself receiving him, the Sudanese government delegation
was received by one of the academic staff in the Department of Political
Science. The Vice Chancellor was conspicuously absent. Garang spoke in the
famous Nkrumah Hall, the venue for all visiting dignitaries. The Sudanese
government delegation was ushered hurriedly into a lecture theater. The
University administration knows who can speak in the lecture theater and who
cannot speak in Nkrumah Hall. The University community made sure that the
Sudan government delegation understands that it had walked into an alien
territory, where Islam in whatever form was not tolerated. Hostility through
rhetoric in the question posed to the delegation was evident from every angle.
But the speakers were not intimidated they were cool and composed taking everything
in their stride. The audience seemed only interested in painting the delegation
as descendants of Arab slave traders presenting an anti- Christian regime.
Islam was taken to be synonymous to Arabia by the born-again Christians in the audience who posed questions, while the Marxists thought the conflict in Sudan
could be solved through class struggle and advised the delegation that the
problem could be understood better through class analysis. It was clear that
the audience was either ignorant of the background to the conflict or was so
much taken by anti-Muslim sentiments portrayed by the international press that it lost all
objectivity, untypical trait of
academicians.
(Excerpts from: "Christian Hegemony and the Rise of Muslims Militancy in Tanzania," by Mohamed Said)
No comments:
Post a Comment